Post by firoj1616 on Feb 15, 2024 11:28:39 GMT
The Federal Court of São Paulo received a complaint from the Federal Public Ministry against the founders of the Renascer em Cristo church, Sônia and Estevam Hernandes. They are accused of evading Income Tax, PIS and social contributions from the company RGC Produções. The complaint was received by judge Hélio Egydio Nogueira, from the 9th Federal Criminal Court of São Paulo. The couple is listed as administrator of the company RGC Produções Ltda. The MPF's argument is that, in 1998, Sônia and Estevam Hernandes omitted bank deposits of unproven origin from their tax declaration, reducing the amount of taxes to be paid in the corporate income tax, PIS and company social contributions . The couple was also denounced in article defines crimes against the tax system), which can increase the penalty from one third to half of that provided for in article years .
The fiscal administrative procedure initiated in 2002 at the request of the MPF became final and unappealable at the Federal Revenue Service this year and the data supported the Federal Police investigation and the complaint signed by the Public Prosecutor Paulo Taubemblatt. The lawyer for the Renascer em Cristo church, Roberto Ribeiro Junior, points out that the couple left the company's corporate membership in 1999. The Italy Email List couple's lawyer, Luiz Flávio Borges D'Urso, has not yet been made aware of the process or the complaint. He prefers to examine the process before speaking out. As the accused have been in Miami since January, unable to travel, the judge ordered that they be summoned and questioned in the United States. A questionnaire with questions from the judge, the MPF and the defense will be sent to the United States in the coming days.
Copies of the process were sent, with judicial authorization and under secrecy, to the Public Ministry of São Paulo, which is also investigating the couple.n turn, it is also necessary to point out art. 19, in the sense that: The tax is non-cumulative, compensating what is due in each transaction relating to the circulation of goods or provision of interstate and intercity transport and communication services with the amount charged in previous transactions for the same or another state. Thus, the conclusion is that there was a disguised increase in the obligation, since if the petitioner is unable to claim ICMS credit in the period from January to March of the current year, as stated in the initial statement, due to Law It is safe to say that more tax will have to be paid, especially when it is known that ICMS is subject to the principle of non-cumulative tax.
The fiscal administrative procedure initiated in 2002 at the request of the MPF became final and unappealable at the Federal Revenue Service this year and the data supported the Federal Police investigation and the complaint signed by the Public Prosecutor Paulo Taubemblatt. The lawyer for the Renascer em Cristo church, Roberto Ribeiro Junior, points out that the couple left the company's corporate membership in 1999. The Italy Email List couple's lawyer, Luiz Flávio Borges D'Urso, has not yet been made aware of the process or the complaint. He prefers to examine the process before speaking out. As the accused have been in Miami since January, unable to travel, the judge ordered that they be summoned and questioned in the United States. A questionnaire with questions from the judge, the MPF and the defense will be sent to the United States in the coming days.
Copies of the process were sent, with judicial authorization and under secrecy, to the Public Ministry of São Paulo, which is also investigating the couple.n turn, it is also necessary to point out art. 19, in the sense that: The tax is non-cumulative, compensating what is due in each transaction relating to the circulation of goods or provision of interstate and intercity transport and communication services with the amount charged in previous transactions for the same or another state. Thus, the conclusion is that there was a disguised increase in the obligation, since if the petitioner is unable to claim ICMS credit in the period from January to March of the current year, as stated in the initial statement, due to Law It is safe to say that more tax will have to be paid, especially when it is known that ICMS is subject to the principle of non-cumulative tax.