Post by firoj1919 on Feb 22, 2024 3:53:26 GMT
The Federal Court decreed judicial intervention in the Cipla conglomerate to ensure that 5% of the group's companies' revenues are allocated to the payment of tax debts with Union bodies. An appointed intervener will replace the commission that managed the conglomerate. The order is from judge Oziel Francisco de Sousa, from the Federal Court of Tax Executions of Joinville. The request was made by INSS. The measure was complied with this Thursday morning by the Federal Police. The determination aims to ensure compliance with the seizure decision. There are more than 130 tax foreclosures against Cipla in the Federal Court. In total, the collection actions would total R$275 million.
In view of this chronic situation of growing debt and the lack of control and reliable clarifications on the accounting, administrative and financial situation, judicial intervention became absolutely necessary,” said the judge, in a statement to workers at Cipla Indústria de Materials de Construção S/A. The decision does not affect Profiplast Industrial S/A, which also belongs to the group, but which is already under intervention by the Santa Oman Mobile Number List Catarina Court. The appointed intervenor was Professor Rainoldo Uessler, who had already been managing Profiplast. The decision stipulates a period of five months for the intervener to carry out a diagnosis, as well as a full audit of the companies. The intervener must also assess whether it is possible for the group to recover and under what conditions.
During the intervention period, salaries and other obligations must be prioritized, in addition to complying with the decision on the seizure of revenue. Cipla Group's labor debt is approximately R$11 million. During the intervention period, auctions of company assets in processes under the jurisdiction of the Federal Tax Execution Court will be suspended.By the way, look at the recent decision of the First Taxpayer Council of the Ministry of Finance: "Tax legislation. Timely application. Less serious rules Tax law applies to past conduct or facts if the conduct is not clearly judged and fails to be defined as An illegal act, or the imposition of a penalty less severe than that provided for by law. The force of its practice. Isolated official fines - wording of Art. Article 44 of Law No. 18 provides that where tax is paid after the due date without payment of late fees, an appeal against an isolated ex officio penalty is not granted.
In view of this chronic situation of growing debt and the lack of control and reliable clarifications on the accounting, administrative and financial situation, judicial intervention became absolutely necessary,” said the judge, in a statement to workers at Cipla Indústria de Materials de Construção S/A. The decision does not affect Profiplast Industrial S/A, which also belongs to the group, but which is already under intervention by the Santa Oman Mobile Number List Catarina Court. The appointed intervenor was Professor Rainoldo Uessler, who had already been managing Profiplast. The decision stipulates a period of five months for the intervener to carry out a diagnosis, as well as a full audit of the companies. The intervener must also assess whether it is possible for the group to recover and under what conditions.
During the intervention period, salaries and other obligations must be prioritized, in addition to complying with the decision on the seizure of revenue. Cipla Group's labor debt is approximately R$11 million. During the intervention period, auctions of company assets in processes under the jurisdiction of the Federal Tax Execution Court will be suspended.By the way, look at the recent decision of the First Taxpayer Council of the Ministry of Finance: "Tax legislation. Timely application. Less serious rules Tax law applies to past conduct or facts if the conduct is not clearly judged and fails to be defined as An illegal act, or the imposition of a penalty less severe than that provided for by law. The force of its practice. Isolated official fines - wording of Art. Article 44 of Law No. 18 provides that where tax is paid after the due date without payment of late fees, an appeal against an isolated ex officio penalty is not granted.